Ita/220/2013 Of M/S. Escapade Resorts (P) Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
30 Oct 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/220/2013 Of M/S. Escapade Resorts (P) Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
30 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/220/2013 Of M/S. Escapade Resorts (P) Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2014/8TH KARTHIKA, 1936
ITA.No. 220 of 2013 ()
-----------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 677/COCH/2010 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHINBENCH DATED 16-11-2012
APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE:
--------------------------------------------------------------
M/S. ESCAPADE RESORTS (P) LTD. C/O.CASINO HOTEL, W/ISLAND, COCHIN-3.
BY ADVS.SRI.JOSEPH MARKOSE (SR.)
SRI.V.ABRAHAM MARKOS
SRI.BINU MATHEW
SRI.TOM THOMAS (KAKKUZHIYIL)
SRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS SRI.ABRAHAM VARGHESE THARAKAN
RESPONDENT(S)/DEPARTMENT:
--------------------------------------------------
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE - I(1), ERNAKULAM.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-10-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ITA NO.220/13
APPENDIX
APPELLANT'S EXHIBITS
ANNEXURE A:TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DT8.12.2009.
ANNEXURE B:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED IN THEAPPEAL DT 15.9.2010 OF TH COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS) II.
ANNEXURE C:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT 16/11/2012PASSED BY THE ITAT IN ITA NO.677/COCH/2010.
//True Copy//
Rp
PA to Judge
ANTONY DOMINIC & ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JJ.
===============================
Income Tax Appeal No. 220 of 2013===========================
Dated this the 30[th] day of October, 2014
J U D G M E N T
Antony Dominic, J.
This appeal is filed in relation to the assessment year 2007-08and the dispute is mainly in relation to the ad hoc disallowance of `5lakhs made towards the deficiencies found in the register maintainedfor miscellaneous expenses. Reading of the order passed by theTribunal shows that this has been reduced to `3 lakhs.
2.Having gone through the order passed by the Tribunal inits entirety and having heard the counsel on both sides, we areinclined to think that the findings are entirely factual and does notgive rise to question of law for determination of this Court.
Appeal is dismissed.
Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE
Rp
Sd/- ANIL K. NARENDRAN JUDGE
//True Copy//PA to Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.