Case LawHigh Court › Ita/22/2003 Of M/S.radha Picture Palace,...

Ita/22/2003 Of M/S.radha Picture Palace,Calicut v. Dy.commr.of Income Tax,Calicut

High Court 11 Dec 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/22/2003 Of M/S.radha Picture Palace,Calicut v. Dy.commr.of Income Tax,Calicut
Date of order
11 Dec 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/22/2003 Of M/S.radha Picture Palace,Calicut v. Dy.commr.of Income Tax,Calicut, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 39 of2003, we dismiss this appeal also filed by the very same assessee foranother year.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH DECEMBER 2009 / 20TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 ITA.No. 22 of 2003() -------------------- ITA.121/COCH/2001 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT IN ITA.121/C/2001 --------------------------------------------------------- M/S.RADHA PICTURE PALACE, REPRESENTED BY PARTNER P.K.MURALIKRISHNAN, S.M.STREET, CALICUT-673 001. BY ADV. SRI.M.PATHROSE MATTHAI, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN (E) SRI.K.P.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT IN ITA 121/C/2001 ------------------------------------------- 1. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, DIVISION-1, CALICUT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALICUT. ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) FOR R SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC FOR IT FOR R THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K. MOHANAN, JJ. -------------------------------------------- I. T. A. No. 22 OF 2003 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of December, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Following the judgment in the connected appeal, I.T.A.No. 39 of2003, we dismiss this appeal also filed by the very same assessee foranother year. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge. (V.K. MOHANAN) Judge. kk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan