Case LawHigh Court › Ita/22/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/22/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Iii, Mumbai v. Piem Hotels Ltd. Mumbai

High Court 18 Sep 2006 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ita/22/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Iii, Mumbai v. Piem Hotels Ltd. Mumbai
Date of order
18 Sep 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/22/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Iii, Mumbai v. Piem Hotels Ltd. Mumbai, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Income Tax Application (L) No.43 of 2002 The Commissioner of Income Tax. .. .. Applicant v/s. Piem Hotels Ltd. .. .. Respondent Mr.A.N.Kotangale for Applicant. Mr.P.C.Tripathi with Mr.Dinesh Vyas for respondent. ----- CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 18th September 2006 P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Kotangale in support of this Application. Mr.Tripathi appears for the respondent. 2. The issue sought to be raised in this matter is concerning the replacement of linen in the hotel run by the respondent. The Tribunal has gone into this aspect and has rightly come to the conclusion that this will have to be considered as a revenue expenditure. We do not think that there is any reason to refer the matter for consideration to the Tribunal. Application is dismissed. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) -2- (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan