In Ita/22/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Iii, Mumbai v. Piem Hotels Ltd. Mumbai, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
Income Tax Application (L) No.43 of 2002
The Commissioner of Income
Tax. .. .. Applicant
v/s.
Piem Hotels Ltd. .. .. Respondent
Mr.A.N.Kotangale for Applicant.
Mr.P.C.Tripathi with Mr.Dinesh Vyas for
respondent.
-----
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 18th September 2006
P.C. :
P.C. :
1. Heard Mr.Kotangale in support of this
Application. Mr.Tripathi appears for the
respondent.
2. The issue sought to be raised in this
matter is concerning the replacement of linen in
the hotel run by the respondent. The Tribunal has
gone into this aspect and has rightly come to the
conclusion that this will have to be considered as
a revenue expenditure. We do not think that there
is any reason to refer the matter for
consideration to the Tribunal. Application is
dismissed.
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
-2-
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.