In Ita/22/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Luv Kush Projects Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITA 22/2011
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.MADAN B. LOKUR
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
(Madan B. Lokur, CJ)
We are sorry to note that this appeal was lying under objections raised by the Registry and was not attended to by the Revenue for as long as nine years
.
This is rather unfortunate and the Revenue should be little more seriousabout prosecuting its cases.
Learned counsel for the Revenue informs us that similar appeals being ITA Nos.15 to 18 of 2003 pertaining to the same assessee raising the same questionof law were dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court on 18.2.2003.Following the decision rendered by this Court, we find that no substantial question of law arises. Dismissed.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue