Ita/223/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M/S.muthoot Leasing And Finance Ltd
High Court
01 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/223/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M/S.muthoot Leasing And Finance Ltd
Date of order
01 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/223/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M/S.muthoot Leasing And Finance Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: No.174/2009, in assessee's owncase, was dismissed by us, following the said judgment this appeal filedby the Department is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2009 / 10TH ASHADHA 1931
ITA.No. 223 of 2009()
---------------------
ITA.13/COCH/2000 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:
--------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
M/S.MUTHOOT LEASING AND FINANCE LTD,
COCHIN.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 01/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
....................................................................I.T. Appeal No.223 of 2009
....................................................................Dated this the 1st day of July, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Since connected appeal I.T.A. No.174/2009, in assessee's owncase, was dismissed by us, following the said judgment this appeal filedby the Department is also dismissed.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
pms
C.K.ABDUL REHIM Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.