Case LawHigh Court › Ita/223/2019 Of The Principal Commission...

Ita/223/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kuthannur Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd

High Court 03 Sep 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/223/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kuthannur Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd
Date of order
03 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/223/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kuthannur Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence the above appeal is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. NARAYANA PISHARADI TUESDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2019 / 12TH BHADRA, 1941 ITA.No.223 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 467/COCH/2018 DATED 29-11-2018 OFI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXTRICHUR. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/APPELLANT/ASSESSSEE: M/S.KUTHANNUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDKUTHANNUR, PALAKKAD-678721. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON03.09.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.K. ABDUL REHIM & R. NARAYANA PISHARADI, JJ. ----------------------------------------------- I.TA.No. 223 of 2019 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3[rd] day of September, 2019 JUDGMENT Abdul Rehim,J Standing Counsel for the appellant submitted that, based on the subsequent development of recalling of the order of the tribunal, the issue involved in the aboveappeal has become infructuous. Therefore it is requestedthat the appeal may be permitted to be withdrawn. Hence the above appeal is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. The Registry shall make refund of the court fee remitted in accordance with the relevant provisions of thelaw. Sd/-C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. Sd/- R. NARAYANA PISHARADI, JUDGE. APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE ATRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED24.03.2016. ANNEXURE BTRUE COPY OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX (APPEALS) DATED 31.07.2018. ANNEXURE CTRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 29.11.2018. ANNEXURE DRESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 31.05.2018. TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE LSN
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan