Ita/224/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Cochin v. Lord Krishna Bank Ltd.,Kochi
High Court
01 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/224/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Cochin v. Lord Krishna Bank Ltd.,Kochi
Date of order
01 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/224/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Cochin v. Lord Krishna Bank Ltd.,Kochi, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeals are accordingly dismissed aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2009 / 10TH ASHADHA 1931
ITA.No. 224 of 2009()
---------------------
ITA.1/COCH/2000 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:
--------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
LORD KRISHNA BANK LTD.
INDIAN EXPRESS BUILDINGS,
KALOOR, KOCHI-17.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ALONG WITH ITA NO.231/2009 ON 01/07/2009, THE COURT
ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
....................................................................I.T. Appeal Nos.224 & 231 of 2009
....................................................................Dated this the 1st day of July, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Since the issue raised is covered by decision of the SupremeCourt in favour of the assessee, department sought permission towithdraw the appeals. Appeals are accordingly dismissed aswithdrawn. The appellant is free to apply for eligible refund of courtfee.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
pms
C.K.ABDUL REHIM Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.