Ita/227/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Sree Lakshmi Silks
High Court
21 Sep 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/227/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Sree Lakshmi Silks
Date of order
21 Sep 2016
Assessment year(s)
2001-02
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/227/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Sree Lakshmi Silks, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21 DAY OF SKHPTRBMBER 2016
PRESENT
THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL
AND
THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICK ARAVIND KUMAR|
ITA NO.227/2012
BETWEEN:
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,C.R.BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE.
2. LHE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD —- 9(1),C.R.BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE.|
_. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND, ADV. FOR|oRI.G.KAMALADHAR, ADV.)
AND:
M/S SREE LAKSHMI SILKS,# 20-1-1, LAKSHMI MANSION,BASAVANNA LANE,
JI.M.ROAD CROSS
BANGALORE — 560 OO2..
— RBSPONDEBENT
(BY SRLA.SHANKAR & M.LAVA, ADVOCATES)
THIS [TA IS FILED UNDER SKC.260-A OF LT.ACT,1961,ARISINGOUTOFORDERDATHRD:20/04/2012 PASSED IN ITA NO.229/BANG/2011, FORTHE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2001-02, PRAYING TO,FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW.STATED THRRBIN AND ALLOW THR APPEAL AND SHT|ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20/04/2012 PASSED BY.THE ITAT BEARING ITA NO.229/BANG/2011, ANDCONHKIRMTHEORDEROKTHEAPPBLLATEKCOMMISSIONBR CONFIRMING THR ORDER PASSED|BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -_ oO(1)BANGALORE IN THE INTEBRESIT OF JUSTICEK AEQUITY.
THIS APPKBAL COMING ON FOR HBARING THISDAY,JAYANT PATEL J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT|
When the matter is taken up tor hearing, the.learned counsel appearing for the Revenue states thatas per the Circular dated 10.12.2015 issued by theCentral Board of Direct Taxes (‘CBDT’ for short), as themonetary limit for pursuing the appeal is raised from
Rs.10,00,000/- (Ten Lakhs) to Rs.20,00,000/- (Twentylakhs) for the High Court litigation and same wouldapply to all pending matters and as the subject matterof the present appeal is not exceeding Rs.20 lakhs, hedoes not press the present appeal. |
Hence, the appeal shall stand disposed of as notpressed.
ok/-
Sd/-.JUDGE|Sd/-.JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.