Ita/228/2013 Of Shri. N.v.george v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
17 Jul 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/228/2013 Of Shri. N.v.george v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
17 Jul 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/228/2013 Of Shri. N.v.george v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the submission somade, this appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC &THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2015/26TH ASHADHA, 1937
I.T.A.No. 228 of 2013 ()
-----------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 266/COCH/2012 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED24-05-2013.
APPELLANT(S):
---------------------
SHRI. N.V.GEORGE, 25/180, GEO BHAVAN, CHALAKUDY, THRISSUR.
BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIR SRI.R.SREEJITH
RESPONDENT(S):
------------------------
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THRISSUR - 680 001.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR. STANDING COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-07-2015, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.T.O.
ANTONY DOMINIC
&
SHAJI P. CHALY, JJ.
-----------------------------------------------
I.T.A. No.228 of 2013
-----------------------------------------------Dated this the 17[th] day of July, 2015
JUDGMENT
Antony Dominic, J.
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that thematter has become infructuous. In view of the submission somade, this appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE
Sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE
//true copy//
P.S. to Judge
St/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue