Ita/229/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Shri Viresh Kalyanji
High Court
31 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/229/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Shri Viresh Kalyanji
Date of order
31 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/229/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Shri Viresh Kalyanji, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: We, therefore, dismiss the appeal leaving freedom to the department ITA 229/2002 -2- to move this court through review or otherwise, after tracing the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
THURSDAY, THE 31ST JANUARY 2008 / 11TH MAGHA 1929
ITA.No. 229 of 2002()
---------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 25/02/2002 IN COCH IN
ITA.855/1995 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT:-
--------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON(SR.),SR.COUNSEL FOR IT
SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT
RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT:-
-------------------------------------------
SHRI VIRESH KALYANJI,
VIRESH & CO., KRISHNA BHAWAN, LALAN ROAD,
KOCHI-2.
BY
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C.N. Ramachandran Nair &T.R. Ramachandran Nair, JJ.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I.T.A.NO.229 of 2002
- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 31st day of January, 2008.
JUDGMENT
C.N. Ramachandran Nair, J.
This is a department appeal filed against concurrent orders of twoappellate authorities, in favour of the assessee. Notice could not be servedon the assessee, as the assessee is not traceable. It is seen from the order ofthe Tribunal that the Tribunal made all efforts to trace the assessee throughits own net work and through the department. Neither the department northe Tribunal could trace the assessee and the matter was decided ex-parte,though in favour of the assessee, after 12 postings. The Tribunal hasrecorded that even the department was not successful in tracing theassessee. If the assessee is not traceable, obviously tax, if any, payableconsequent upon the department getting favourable orders from this court,cannot be recovered. The appeal therefore serves only academic purposefor the department. We, therefore, do not think that we should waste ourtime on this appeal which is pending before this court for the last five years.
We, therefore, dismiss the appeal leaving freedom to the department
ITA 229/2002
-2-
to move this court through review or otherwise, after tracing the assessee.
(C.N. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)
(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)
kav/
ITA 229/2002
C.N. Ramachandran Nair & &T.R. Ramachandran Nair, JJ.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I.T.A. No.229 of 2002- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JUDGMENT
31[st] January, 2008.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.