Ita/231/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Shri Muninaga Reddy
High Court
11 Aug 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/231/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Shri Muninaga Reddy
Date of order
11 Aug 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/231/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Shri Muninaga Reddy, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. © sd/- JUDGE Sd/-|JUDGE.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THER HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11 DAY OF AUGUST 2015)
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN-
AND.
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B MANOHAR
ITA No.231 OF 2015
BETWEEN :
1.The Commissioner of |Income Tax, C R BuildingQueens Road, Bangalore-560 001.Income Tax, C R BuildingQueens Road, Bangalore-560 001.oDThe Assistant Commissioner
Of Income Tax, Circle-6(1), ©
Rashtrothana Bhavan
Nrupathunga Road, Bangalore. |
.. Appellants
(By Sri K V Aravind and Sri EK I Sanmathi, Advs.)
AND:
Shri Muninaga ReddyNo.45, 3['/]B Main, 4[4 ]Cross;['/]Block, Kalyan NagarBangalore-560 043PAN : ABFLPR 5736E... Respondent.
This ITA is filed u/s.260-a of LT.Act, 1961 arising out of|otder dated 13-1-2015 passed in ITA No.859/Bang/2012, for theassessment year 2006-2007, praying that this Hon'ble Court maybe pleased to: (1). formulate the substantial questions of law statedabove (it) allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by theITAT Bangalore in ITA No.859/Bang/2012 dated 13-01-2015confirming the order of the Appellate Commissioner and confirmthe order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle-6(1), Bangalore.
This appeal coming on for admission this day,|VINFEFTSARAN, }. delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
oti KV Aravind, learned counsel tor the appellants has
stated that the appellants do not wish to press this appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. ©
sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-|JUDGE.
Bkm.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue