Ita/23/2018 Of Jaycees Public School v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
05 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Ita/23/2018 Of Jaycees Public School v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
05 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/23/2018 Of Jaycees Public School v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Therefore, this Income Tax Appeal is, hereby, dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL
THE HON’BLE THE CHI EF JUSTI CE SRI RAGHVENDRA SI NGH CHAUHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
I NCOME TAX APPEAL No. 2 3 OF 2 0 1 8
5[t h ]Mar ch , 2 0 2 1
Between:
Jaycees Public School
……Appellant.
and
Income Tax Officer, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. …Respondent
Nagar. …Respondent Counsel for the appellant : Mr. Sunil Khera. Counsel for the respondent : Mr. H.M. Bhatia, learned counsel for the respondent.
Th e Cou r t m ade t h e follow in g:
JUDGMENT : (p er Hon ’ble Th e Ch ief Ju st ice Sr i Ragh v en dr a Sin gh Ch au h an )
Mr. Sunil Khera, learned counsel for the appellant, seeks the liberty to withdraw this appeal from this Court.
2. Therefore, this Income Tax Appeal is, hereby, dismissed as withdrawn.
3. No order as to costs.
4. In sequel thereto, pending application, if any, stands disposed-of.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
RAGHVENDRA SI NGH CHAUHAN, C.J.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
Dt: 5[th] March, 2021 Rathour
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue