Case LawHigh Court › Ita/232/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/232/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Judicial

High Court 11 Sep 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/232/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Judicial
Date of order
11 Sep 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/232/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Judicial, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATLBD THIS THE 1 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015 PRESENT. THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B MANOHAR| ITA No.232/2015 BETWEEN: 1.THERE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TA C R BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD.BANGALORE,BANGALORE, oDTHER INCOME-TAX OFFICERWARD — 9(1), JEEVAN SAMPIGE| FLOOR, 1/11, SAMPIGEWARD — 9(1), JEEVAN SAMPIGE| FLOOR, 1/11, SAMPIGEROAD, MALLESWARAM,BANGALORE-560 003. _~~ APPELLANTSBANGALORE-560 003. _~~ APPELLANTS (BY SRI K V ARAVIND, ADV). AND: M/s.JUDICIAL DEPARTMENTMULTIPURPOSE CO-OPERTIVE.SOCIETY LTD., No.1, HIGH COURTBUILDING, OPP. VIDHANA SOUDHAVIDHANA VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001PAN : AAAAJ 4636N|RESPONDENT (BY SRI S PARTHASARATHY, ADV.O THIS JTA IS FILED UNDER SKBCTION 260A OFINCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED09.12.2014 PASSED IN ITA No.494/BANG/2014 FOR THEASSKSSMENT YBAR 2010-2011 PRAYING TO BORMULATETHE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVEAND ALLOW THR APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THER ORDERPASSE]DBY|THE,ITAT,BANGALORE,IN|ITANo.494/BANG/2014 DATED 09.12.2014 CONFIRMING THEORDER OR THR APPEKELLATKE COMMISSIONER ACONFIRM THR ORDER PASSKID BY THER INCOME TAOFFICER, WARD-9(1), BANGALORE. | THIS [TA COMING ON BOR ADMISSION ‘THISDAY,VINEET SARAN,, J.,DELIVERED THER KFOLLOWING JUDGMENT Heard St1 K V Aravind, learned counsel for the appellants as_well as Sri S Parthasarathy, learned counsel for the respondent andperused the record. 2The question involved in this appeal is covered by the decision of this Court in the case ofCommissioner ofIncome Tax - vs- Sri Biluru Gurubasava Pattina Sahakari Sangha Niyamitha Bagalkot in ITA No.5006/2013decided on 05.02.2014. �4�9:.�52@:9��8�9:.�/8�0.,/21� ��9:2,�/;;./5�,9/41,�12,B2,,.1���������� Bkm �1!$������� �1!$�������
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan