Case LawHigh Court › Ita/232/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/232/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Exemption v. Eklavya Foundation Through None

High Court 23 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/232/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Exemption v. Eklavya Foundation Through None
Date of order
23 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/232/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Exemption v. Eklavya Foundation Through None, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 232/2018 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-EXEMPTION ..... Appellant ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Adv. versus EKLAVYA FOUNDATION Through None. ..... Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R% 23.02.2018 The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s (ITAT) order upholding the CIT(A)’s decision that the assessee’s income was out of charitable activities and was thus entitled to benefit under Section 2 (15) read with Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’), has been challenged. The subject matter of the present appeal is publication of education books aimed at inculcating the reading habit. These books are targeted for the States of Jharkhand and Bihar. The Assessing Officer (AO) brought to tax the amounts claimed to be charitable receipts holding that the expenses incurred on the books were considerable and that the published books were not text books and therefore, could not be said to fall within the description of education. Both the CIT (A) and ITAT disagreed and took into account the aims and objects of the assessee’s society. The CIT(A) observed that the assessee’s activity was funded by grants, which covered the development cause for the books that it published and distributed, as well as other expenses and what it recovered was printing, binding and distribution charges. Having regard to these findings, the Court is of the opinion that no substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J FEBRUARY 23, 2018 rc A. K. CHAWLA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan