Case LawHigh Court › Ita/233/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/233/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shree Vidyadhiraja Vidya Samajam

High Court 02 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/233/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shree Vidyadhiraja Vidya Samajam
Date of order
02 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/233/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shree Vidyadhiraja Vidya Samajam, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM THURSDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2009 / 11TH ASHADHA 1931 ITA.No. 233 of 2009() --------------------- ITA.395/COCH/2003 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT: ----------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT --------------------------------- SHREE VIDYADHIRAJA VIDYA SAMAJAM, CHETTIKULANGARA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ----------------------------------- I.T.A. No. 233 of 2009 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 2[nd] day of July, 2009 J U D G M E N T---------------------- Ramachandran Nair,J. Since the connected appeal ITA.No.10/2009 wasdismissed, following the said judgment in assessee's own case wedismiss this appeal. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. okb
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan