Ita/233/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Gopalan Enterprises
High Court
29 Feb 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/233/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Gopalan Enterprises
Date of order
29 Feb 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/233/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Gopalan Enterprises, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(f)
DCCDCOC-,CDai’HCM—-HCMDirt.CDDiga>CDC)CDCD—CDOH:trCDCDCD,cCD0HaDlx3:f)9an$0:“>•Cur-t3CDaCM—.Lb00CDCD3CDCCM—DiCM—.uirt0CLCDaCDDiDCCDDHo-Ca-h-
Di
CDCDrtCDat•rtDiCDCDCaCDCaoCD3CDDrP—0CDa
CD
3
n
a-
0C
<
Di-ja—<0C>c—a-CDCDCD3 a3HaaCD—Dl•tOgCL00CDCtfl:i>
3
3
H
CD
Ni
Dl
a
H
0
Ct
CD
—h
CD
a
0
tj
-‘
CDOaflt
a
(C
Ca
—
fl
CD
CL
CM
Dl
CD
rt
rt
CD
=
CDrtHrtCLCDo0CMaQh;CDCDa<>aCDErt3aggCM$Q$aQ!CDft)3cgCDCM0CDCcuCDElC)CMgaCDHa°H.llDiCD<CD,rtDC$:aCL-CDDlNHH03CtaaCo-jCD=CDCDCCMHCDCDcCDCLCMCDartDCCDCD0Cl0——%CDCDDirHCMECD0—CflCDDi$aCD—CDCDvt$CD0rt—HrtCDDi
a
0
h
CDa
CD
—
DC
0
3;Doo
H3
CD;
N
CM:
-t
CD
rt
CD
,—
a*
-C
Cl
CD
Haa—
CD
CD
9
0
H
Di
—
rt
0CL—0C
0
n
0
fl.
CD
rt
CD
—0
CD
rt
rtaC
CM
0
0C0CD0CMaCCDDCaCDn3.-rCMCD-CuCD.CDrta0rt—CDCDHCDrrC0Ca-‘CMCD0-CtCMCD—.CDCD)CD—t)ClCD(J-,DiCMCMCDCD-H.CLrt$ftpDCCMCM3.—-aDli—’:CDa5CDrtrtCDCD0CDCD
—CT
CD
—CT
-)
CD
C
-‘
CD
-
H
CD-
Dl
—
t
CD
N
CM
3CC)
CD
a
H
—
CD
CD
rt
DC
0
C
an:3—0aU,aa-‘a000<oEato‘:3a0a0aaoa
z
a
io
00<
U,
0
a
0
—
a
C
a
U,
U,9-
Z3
0
a
—‘
—
C):)
ti Q.
a
Grt
9
U,
U,9
a
ao
9.
U,
.
C)N)a0rr9a0a-U,athP‘aathU,-ra00a9-9aa.aa‘-ac9to—0a0a09-a——.aaa—:3—aa00aoa0—oa0a—araaa,:C))0-9aaa—a-aaaa0—‘<-aa0aarta9a9.29>-:3a9.-,N)0acc9->U,3Q—h
CM
a
(1)
a
0
a
0
c
tO
n
.rt0‘-9-
rt
9
0
rt
rta
a
0
Zr
a
-
-t
-t9-
a
U,
0
rt
U,
U,
a
a
a
g.
a
9
a9.
a
a
aa
a
Q:
0
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.