Ita/234/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. K.nandakumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC &THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JULY 2015/25TH ASHADHA, 1937 I.TA.No. 234 of 2013 () ----------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA NO.485/COCH/2011 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED28-02-2013. APPELLANT/RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT: ------------------------------------------ K.NANDAKUMAR, TC 2/2526(3), TKV NAGAR, GOLF LINKS ROAD, TRIVANDRUM -695 003. BY ADVS. SRI.K.ANAND (SR.) SMT.LATHA KRISHNAN THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-07-2015, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.T.O. I.T.A.NO.234 OF 2013 APPENDIX APPELLANT'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE-A:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER U/S.143(3) DATED 29/2-12/2008. ANNEXURE-B:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX U/S. 263 DATED 03.02.2011.TAX U/S. 263 DATED 03.02.2011. ANNEXURE-C:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER U/S. 143(3)/263 DATED 06.05.2011.(3)/263 DATED 06.05.2011. ANNEXURE-D:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) DATED 08.03.2013. ANNEXURE-E:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 28.02.2013. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE St/- ANTONY DOMINIC & SHAJI P. CHALY, JJ. ----------------------------------------------- I.T.A. No.234 of 2013 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16[th] day of July, 2015 JUDGMENT Antony Dominic, J. Heard the learned Senior Standing Counsel for theappellant and the learned Senior Counsel appearing for theRespondent. 2.Revenue has filed this appeal against the orderpassed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin inI.T.A.No.485/Coch/2011. Appeal to the Tribunal was preferredby the Respondent against the order passed by theCommissioner in a suo motu revision directing the AssessingOfficer to deny deduction under Sec.54 of the Income Tax Act.By the impugned order, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal,and directed the Assessing Officer to examine whether theRespondent is eligible for exemption under Sec.54 when thecapital gain amount was not deposited in the specified accountas provided under Sec.54(2) of the Act. I.T.A.No.234 of 2013 3.Though this order is challenged on various grounds,the learned Senior Counsel for the Respondent informs that incompliance with the directions of the Tribunal, the AssessingOfficer re-considered the matter and passed order denying thededuction claimed by the assessee. It is also stated thatagainst the order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee hasfiled an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) on 27.12.2013 and that the said appeal has beennumbered as ITA No.108/TVM/CIT(A)/2013-14. 3.In the light of the above developments subsequentto the order impugned, we do not think it necessary to go intothe merits of the rival contentions. 4.The appeal is therefore disposed of leaving theparties to agitate the matter before the concerned authoritywho is now seized of the matter. Sd/-ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE Sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE //true copy// P.S. to Judge I.T.A.No.234 of 2013 St/-