Ita/235/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Ldh v. Satish Bala Malhotra & Ors
High Court
11 Aug 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/235/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Ldh v. Satish Bala Malhotra & Ors
Date of order
11 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/235/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Ldh v. Satish Bala Malhotra & Ors, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the other appeals, other issues were also involved and therefore,notice of motion was issued in all the appeals in respect of the other issues.However, in this appeal, no other issue arises. © Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in view of the order dated28.10.2013.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
ITA No. 235 of 2012 (O&M)Date of decision:11.08.2016
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana ©Versus|
..Appellant
Smt. Satish Bala Malhotra and others ~
...Respondents
CORAMHONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. J. VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICEHON5BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
Present: Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Pankaj Jain, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocate ©Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate
Mr. Gaurav Mittal, Advocate for the respondents.
ee
S.J. VAZIFDAR, C.J. (QRAL)
This is an appeal against the order of the Tribunal in respect ofthe assessment year 2006-07. The appellant/Department raised substantialquestions of law relating to deemed dividend. The Division Bench of thisCourt by an order dated 28.10.2013, in a group of income tax appealsincluding the present appeal, held that the Tribunal had rightly deleted thisaddition. In the other appeals, other issues were also involved and therefore,notice of motion was issued in all the appeals in respect of the other issues.However, in this appeal, no other issue arises. ©
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in view of the order dated28.10.2013.
(S.J. VAZIFDAR)CHIEF JUSTICE
(DEEPAK SIBAL)JUDGE)
11.08.2016%&
Whether speaking/reasoned
Yes/No)
Whether reportable
Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.