Ita/235/2022 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Timblo Pvt Ltd
High Court
06 Apr 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/235/2022 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Timblo Pvt Ltd
Date of order
06 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
2009-2010
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/235/2022 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Timblo Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6 DAY OF APRIL, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
I.T.A.No.235/2022
BETWEEN :
1 . THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING, QUEEN’S ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING, QUEEN’S ROAD, BENGALURU-560001
2 . THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, PLOT NO.5, EDC COMPLEX, PATTO, PANAJI-403001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI M.DILIP, ADV. FOR SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND :
M/s TIMBLO PVT. LTD., KADAR MANZIL, NEAR HARI MANDIR, MARGAO, GOA-403601 PAN: …RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 07.10.2021 PASSED IN C.O.24/PAN/2017 IN IT(SS)A NO.15/PAN/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF
LAW STATED THEREIN AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN C.O.No.24/PAN/2017 IN IT(SS)A NO.15/PAN/2017 DATED 07.10.2021 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010 ANNEXURE-D CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANAJI, GOA.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, S. SUJATHA, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the above appeal with liberty to file the same before the appropriate Court.
2. Memo is placed on record. Permission is granted.
3. Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn with
liberty as sought for.
4. Registry shall return the original documents,
if any, to the appellants, keeping photocopies of the same for record purpose.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
PMR
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.