Ita/236/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Navas M Meeran
High Court
26 Jul 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/236/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Navas M Meeran
Date of order
26 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/236/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Navas M Meeran, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Referring to the Supreme Court judgment and latest circular, we are of theview that the appeal is not maintenable, hence is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
MONDAY, THE 26 DAY OF JULY 2021 / 4TH SRAVANA, 1943
ITA NO. 236 OF 2010
AGAINST THE ORDER IN IT(S&S)A.No.146/Coch/2005 dated 5.11.2009 OFI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCOCHIN.
BY ADV SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT:
SHRI NAVAS M MEERANMANALUMPARAYIL HOUSE, ADIMALI.BY ADVS.SRI.S.ARUN RAJSMT.C.T.SUJA
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.07.2021,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
S.V.Bhatti, J.
JUDGMENT
The Revenue is the appellant in the instant appeal.
2. Heard learned Standing counsel Sri Jose Joseph for the appellant andAdv.S.Arunraj for respondent.
3. The value in the appeal is less than the limit prescribed by CBDT Circular.The Supreme Court in the judgment reported in S.C.Naregal v Commissioner of
Income Tax (2019) 418 ITR 455 (SC) has considered the effect of CBDT Circularand dismissed the appeal coming within the purport of CBDT Circular.
4. The valuation of the subject appeal, since is less than the limit stipulated byCBDT Circular, and also the judgment of Apex Court in S.C.Naregal (supra) isapplicable to the appeal.
Referring to the Supreme Court judgment and latest circular, we are of theview that the appeal is not maintenable, hence is dismissed.
Sd/- S.V.BHATTIJUDGE
sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.