Case LawHigh Court › Ita/236/2016 Of Pr Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/236/2016 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 Chandigarh v. M/S Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation Ltd, Chd

High Court 03 Sep 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/236/2016 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 Chandigarh v. M/S Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation Ltd, Chd
Date of order
03 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/236/2016 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 Chandigarh v. M/S Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation Ltd, Chd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ITA No.236 of 2016 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH ITA No.236 of 2016 (O&M)Date of decision : 03.09.2019 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1,Chandigarh ...... Appellant VerTSU M/s Punjab Small Industries & ExportCorporation Ltd., Udyog Bhawan, Sector 17Chandigarh ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEKE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICHARNARESH SINGH GILL--- Present ;Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocatefor the appellant. Mr. Manpreet S.Kanda, Advocate|for the respondent. --- AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) inLearned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that sincethe tax effect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed inCircular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board ofDirect Taxes, further amended vide Circular No.l7 of 2019 datedOS.O08.2019 read with Letter No.E.No.279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ dated20.08.2019, he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal. However,he prayed that liberty be granted to the appellant-revenue to file anapplication for revival of the appeal, in case something survives therein. ?DDismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is,however,clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the appellant-revenue shall not be taken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. ITA No.236 of 2016 (O&M) Further, the legal issue as claimed by the appellant-revenue is being leftopen to be adjudicated in an appropriate case. 3Since the main case has been dismissed, the pending C.M.Application, if any, also stands disposed of, (AJAY TEWARITJUDGE (HARNARESH SINGH GILL)JUDGE03.09.2019pooja sharma-lWhether speaking/reasonedYes/NoWhether Reportable |Yes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan