Ita/237/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Rajesh Exports Ltd
High Court
28 Sep 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/237/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Rajesh Exports Ltd
Date of order
28 Sep 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/237/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Rajesh Exports Ltd, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28[tn]DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020.
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I. ARUN.1LT.A. NO.237 OF 2017
BEI|WEEN
1.PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL.QUUENS ROAD, BANGALORE.QUUENS ROAD, BANGALORE.
2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.CIRCLE-12(4), BANGALORE.CIRCLE-12(4), BANGALORE.
_.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. E.I1. SANMATHI, ADV.)
AND"
M/S. RAJESH EXPORTS LTDNO.4, BATAVIA CHAMBERS|K.R. ROAD, K.P. WEST|BANGALORE-560001PAN: AAACR8642N.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SAMPATH KUMAR K, ADV.,)
THIS kI§I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 2600-AI.T.ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 31-05-2016|PASSED IN ITA NO.859/BANG/2010, FOR THE ASSESSMENTYEAR 2006-07, VIDE ANNEXURE-A PRAYING TQ:
I. DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND/OR|SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED|BY THE HON’BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT.
II. SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 31-05-2016|PASSED BY THE ITAT, A’ BENCH, BANGALORE, IN APPEAL.PROCEEDINGS ITA NO.859/BANG/2010 DATED 31-5-2016|FORASSESSMENT|YEAR2006-07(PRODUCEDAS|ANNEXURE-A), AS SOUGHT FOR IN THIS APPEAL; AND TO,GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED FIT, IN THE!INTEREST OF JUSTCE.
THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Mr.E.I.Sanmathi, learned counsel for the revenue.
Mr.Sampath Kumar K., learned counsel for the|aSSeSsSee.
?. Learned counsel! for the assessee submits thatthe tax effect in this appeal is less than41 Crore andtnerefore, the appeal may not be maintainable in view ofthe Circular No.1/7/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by theCentral Board of Direct Taxes.
3. On the other hand, learned counsel for therevenue submits that he be granted liberty to revive the
appeal in case the matter falls within the exceptionsunder the aforesaid Circular dated 08.08.2019.
4. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the appeal
is disposed of with liberty as prayed for by the learned
counse|l for the revenue
RV|
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-"JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.