Case LawHigh Court › Ita/238/2017 Of M/S Nyayamitra Sahakari...

Ita/238/2017 Of M/S Nyayamitra Sahakari Bank Niyamita v. The Director Of Income Tax

High Court 08 Jan 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/238/2017 Of M/S Nyayamitra Sahakari Bank Niyamita v. The Director Of Income Tax
Date of order
08 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/238/2017 Of M/S Nyayamitra Sahakari Bank Niyamita v. The Director Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8[TH|]DAY OF JANUARY 2071 PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASW AMY 1LT.A. NO.238 OF 2017BETWEEN: M/S. NYAYAMITRA SAHAKARIBANK NIYAMITAREP. BY SRI. PRASANNA D.R. GENERAL MANAGER INCHARGEBASEMENT FLOORHIGH COURT BUILDINGDR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHIBANGALORE-560001 PAN No: AAAAN6 339E (BY MR. RAMA MURTHY R, ADV.,) — ADPELLANT AND" THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX|(INTELLIGENCE & CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION)5TH FLOOR, C.R. BUILDING ANNEX|QUEEN'S ROAD, BANGALORE 560001..., RESPONDENT (BY MR. DILIP KUMAR, ADV., FORMR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) | THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. J6O0-A OF INCOME TAXACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 31.01.2017 PASSEDIN ITA NO.688/BANG/2015 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14,PRAYING TQ: | (1) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS.STATED ABOVE. (ii) ALLOW THIS APPEAL OF THE APPELLANT MODIFYING.THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED.31-01-2017 IN ITA NO.688/BANG/2015 & ETC. THIS|I.7T.A. COMING ONFORORDERS,THISDAY,ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: | JUDGMENT Mr.Rama Murthy R., learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for Mr.K.V.Aravind,|jearned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for tne assessee nas filed a memo'seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Theaforesaid memo is taken on record. 2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal isdismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revivethe same if occasion so arises. Sd/-JUDGE Sd/-—JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan