Ita/239/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai City Imumbai v. Shree Krishna Woollen Mills P. Ltd
High Court
12 Jun 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ita/239/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai City Imumbai v. Shree Krishna Woollen Mills P. Ltd
Date of order
12 Jun 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/239/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai City Imumbai v. Shree Krishna Woollen Mills P. Ltd, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2002
AND
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.23 OF 2002
AND
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.101 OF 2002
AND
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.103 OF 2002
AND
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.239 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income ..Applicant.
V/s.
Shree Krishna Wollen Mills P.Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale with Mr.Prashant Uchil for applicant
in all matters.
Mr.H.S.Khurana for respondent in all matters.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND
DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2006.
P.C. :-
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.
Having going throughthe findings of fact recorded by
the Tribunal, we see no substantial question of law
arise warranting adjudication by this Court. The
observations of the Tribunal are reproduced
hereinbelow:-
" It is incumbent on the assessee to place
material of the primary facts which in all reasonable probability would show that he was not guilty of any fraud or gross or wilful neglect. From the facts
available on record, there is no inkling of fraud or
wilful neglect on the part of the assessee. "
All the applications are, therefore,
dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.