Case LawHigh Court › Ita/239/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/239/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai City Imumbai v. Shree Krishna Woollen Mills P. Ltd

High Court 12 Jun 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ita/239/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai City Imumbai v. Shree Krishna Woollen Mills P. Ltd
Date of order
12 Jun 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/239/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai City Imumbai v. Shree Krishna Woollen Mills P. Ltd, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2002 AND INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.23 OF 2002 AND INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.101 OF 2002 AND INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.103 OF 2002 AND INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.239 OF 2002 The Commissioner of Income ..Applicant. V/s. Shree Krishna Wollen Mills P.Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Ashok Kotangale with Mr.Prashant Uchil for applicant in all matters. Mr.H.S.Khurana for respondent in all matters. CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2006. P.C. :- Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. Having going throughthe findings of fact recorded by the Tribunal, we see no substantial question of law arise warranting adjudication by this Court. The observations of the Tribunal are reproduced hereinbelow:- " It is incumbent on the assessee to place material of the primary facts which in all reasonable probability would show that he was not guilty of any fraud or gross or wilful neglect. From the facts available on record, there is no inkling of fraud or wilful neglect on the part of the assessee. " All the applications are, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C. DAGA, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan