Ita/239/2021 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Edgeverse Systems Ltd
High Court
20 Jun 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/239/2021 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Edgeverse Systems Ltd
Date of order
20 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
2019-2020
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/239/2021 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Edgeverse Systems Ltd, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the Circular dated 24.06.2019, the tax effect in this appeal being less than rupees one crore, appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20 DAY OF JUNE, 2022 PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
ITA NO. 239 OF 2021
BETWEEN
1 . THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 4 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA, BENGALURU -560 095. INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 4 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA, BENGALURU -560 095.
2 . THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(1), 4TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 095. INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(1), 4TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 095.
...APPELLANTS
(By Sri : ARAVIND K V, ADVOCATE)
AND
M/S EDGEVERSE SYSTEMS LTD 44/97A, KONAPPANA AGRAHARA, HOSUR ROAD, ELECTRONIC CITY, BENGALURU-560 100
PAN TAN BLRE06897C
…RESPONDENT
(By Sri T SURYANARAYANA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR MS.TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACTR, 1961, IS ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 10/09/2020 PASSED IN IT(IT)A NO.14/BANG/2020 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2019-2020 PRAYING TO FORMULATED THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND ETC.,
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY
P.S. DINESH KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Sri T. Suryanarayana, learned Senior Advocate for the respondent/Assessee submits that the tax effect is less than Rupees one crore i.e. Rs.82,53,237/-. He has filed a memo dated 16.11.2021 indicating/showing the tax effect.
2. Sri Aravind K.V., learned Standing counsel for
the appellants submits that in similar cases this Court has disposed of the appeal reserving liberty to the Revenue to reopen the case in the event, the tax effect is more than Rupees one crore.
3. In view of the Circular dated 24.06.2019, the
tax effect in this appeal being less than rupees one crore, appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
BS
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.