Case LawHigh Court › Ita/241/2024 Of Sarita Dudheria v. Assis...

Ita/241/2024 Of Sarita Dudheria v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 26 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/241/2024 Of Sarita Dudheria v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
26 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
2013-2014, 2013-14
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/241/2024 Of Sarita Dudheria v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitally signedby SHAKAMBARILocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA NC: 2025:KHC:12702-DB ITA No. 241 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26 DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 241 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SARITA DUDHERIA W/O LAXMIPAT DUDHERIA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 66, NAVNIKETAN, K.R.ROAD BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU-560 004 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. K.R. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE) AND: ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(2) NO.01, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE) THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC. 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 15/3/2022 PASSED IN ITA NO.380/BANG/2020, ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014 PRAYING TO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON'BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'B' BENCH, BANGALORE DATED 15.03.2022 IN ITA NO. 380/BANG/2020 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14 AS SOUGHT FOR IN THIS APPEAL AND ETC. THE DATED 15.03.2022 IN ITA NO. 380/BANG/2020 FOR THE THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 2 - CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT) Appeal is not maintainable against the order concerned inasmuch as, in terms of said order, matter having been remanded afresh, order de novo has been passed by the Assessing Officer. Therefore, it is open to the assessee to challenge that new order taking up all grounds, including the right to cross-examination and jurisdiction as well. In the above circumstances, the appeal is disposed off, all contentions of both parties having been kept open. Costs made easy. Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE AM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12 Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan