Ita/24/2019 Of Madan Singh v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
27 Jan 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/24/2019 Of Madan Singh v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
27 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
2014-2015
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/24/2019 Of Madan Singh v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27 DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
BETWEEN:
ITA NO.24/2019
MADAN SINGH S/O SRI NATHU SINGH AGED 56 YEARS H-1801, THE GARDENS K.P.AGRAHARA, MAGADI ROAD BANGALORE-560 023
…APPELLANT
(BY SMT.PRATHIBHA R, ADV.,)
AND:
1. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3 (2) (1), BMTC BUILDING 1 FLOO, 80 FEET ROAD, 6 BLOCK, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE-560 095 WARD 3 (2) (1), BMTC BUILDING 1 FLOO, 80 FEET ROAD, 6 BLOCK, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE-560 095
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-10, BANGALORE 7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING 80 FT ROAD, 6 BLOCK KORAMANGALA BANGALORE-560 095
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.ARAVIND K.V., ADV.,)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 31.08.2018 PASSED IN ITA NO.140/BANG/2018, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015 AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated
20.01.2021 seeking withdrawal of the petition.
The prayer is allowed.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
SSD
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue