Ita/242/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Chelannur Service Co Op Bank Ltd
High Court
09 Feb 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/242/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Chelannur Service Co Op Bank Ltd
Date of order
09 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/242/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Chelannur Service Co Op Bank Ltd, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 20TH MAGHA,1942
ITA.No.242 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 517/2018 DATED 07-02-2019 OFI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
APPELLANT/S:
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXKOZHIKODE.
RESPONDENT/S:
BY ADV. SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
CHELANNUR SERVICE CO OP BANK LTDCHELANNUR, KOZHIKODE.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.A.KUMARR1 BY ADV. SMTG.MINI(1748)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON09.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 9th day of February 2021
S.V.BHATTI.J.
Memo dated 14.01.2021 filed by Sri.Christopher Abraham, learnedSenior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department to withdraw the appealis ordered. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Sri.Christopher Abraham draws our attention to the judgment ofthis Court in I.T.A. No.74 of 2016 dated 11.11.2019 and states that refundof proportionate court fee, taking into consideration the memo filed towithdraw the appeal etc., has been granted.
Refund of proportionate court fee is ordered. Hence the Registrymakes refund of court fee to the extent admissible in law.
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTIJUDGE
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.