Ita/246/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.kerala Vision Limited

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA, 1941 ITA.No.246 OF 2014 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 06-06-2014 IN ITA NO.794/2013 OFI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TRICHUR. BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SENIOR COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE M/S.KERALA VISION LIMITED,1/1 J, KRISHNA BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR, P.O.VIYYOOR, THRISSUR-680010. BY ADV. SRI.S.ARUN RAJ THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON05.12.2019, ALONG WITH CO.NO.146/2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA, 1941 CO.No.146 OF 2015 IN ITA. NO.246/2014 AGAINST THE ORDER 06.06.2014 IN ITA NO.246/2014 OF HIGH COURT OFKERALA CROSS OBJECTOR/RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE M/S.KERALA VISION LTD.,ALPHA COMPLEX, 2ND FLOOR, THOPPIN MOOLA, THRISSUR-680 004. BY ADV. SRI.S.ARUN RAJ RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THRISSUR-680001 THIS CROSS OBJECTION/CROSS APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARDON 05.12.2019, ALONG WITH ITA.NO.246/2014, THE COURT ON THE SAMEDAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.K.ABDUL REHIM & T.V. ANILKUMAR ,JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =I.T.A. No.246 of 2014 & C.O. No.146 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Dated this the 5[th] day of December, 2019 C O M M O N J U D G M E N T C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J. The Standing for Government of India (Taxes) seekspermission of this Court to withdraw the above appeal, based onthe litigation policy declared by the Central Board of DirectTaxes(CBDT). 2.In view of the above submission learned counsel for thecross objector submitted that the cross-objection also may bedismissed as not pressed. 3.Under the above circumstances both the Income TaxAppeal as well as the Cross-objection are hereby dismissed aswithdrawn. The Registry shall make refund of the court fee in both thecases, to the extent permissible under law. DST Sd/- C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE Sd/- T.V. ANILKUMAR,JUDGE //True copy// PA.To Judge