Case LawHigh Court › Ita/246/2018 Of Sri. P. N. Manjunath v....

Ita/246/2018 Of Sri. P. N. Manjunath v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 18 Jan 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/246/2018 Of Sri. P. N. Manjunath v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
18 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/246/2018 Of Sri. P. N. Manjunath v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18 DAY OF JANUARY, 2021 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA I.T.A. NO.246/2018 BETWEEN: SRI. P. N. MANJUNATH S/O. LATE SRI. NARAYAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, NO.190, SOUNDARYA DAMINI, 4 CROSS, 4 PHASE, DOLLARS COLONY, J. P. NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 078. …APPELLANT (BY SRI MALLAHARAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CR BUILDINGS, QUEENS ROAD BENGALURU. CR BUILDINGS, QUEENS ROAD BENGALURU. 2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER ITO – WARD 4 (3) (3) KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU. … RESPONDENTS THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED 31.05.2016 PASSED IN ITA NOS.29 AND 30/BANG/2015, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2006-2007 AND 2008-2009 VIDE ANNEXURE-A., PRAYING TO (1) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE (2) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET-ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 31.05.2016 BEARING ITA NOS. 29 AND 30/BANG/2015, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2006-2007 AND 2008-2009 VIDE ANNEXURE-A (3) PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a Memo for withdrawal of the appeal. The same is allowed. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The Memo be placed on record. Liberty is also granted to file a fresh appeal, in case need so arise in future. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE hnm
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan