Case LawHigh Court › Ita/248/2020 Of Pr Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/248/2020 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S Broadcom Communications

High Court 27 Jun 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/248/2020 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S Broadcom Communications
Date of order
27 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
2013-2014
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/248/2020 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S Broadcom Communications, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: Appeal is disposed of as having become infructous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitally signedbyMARIGANGAIAHPREMAKUMARILocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27 DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.M.NADAF INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 248 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 BMTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU. BMTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE - 1(1) (2) BENGALURU. OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE - 1(1) (2) BENGALURU. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SANMATHI E. I., ADV.) AND: M/S. BROADCOM COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED (EARLIER KNOWN AS BROADCOM INDIA RESEARCH PRIVATE LIMITED) S1, WIPRO ELECTRONIC CITY SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE, DODDATHOGUR VILLAGE BEGUR HOBLI, ELECTRONIC CITY BANGALORE – 560100. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. MANASA ANANTHAN, ADV. FOR SMT. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADV.) THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 14.06.2019 PASSED IN IT (TP)A NO.1929/BANG/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.M.NADAF HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22624-DB ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) Learned counsel Sri.E.I.Sanmathi for appellants/Revenue on instructions submit that dispute between the appellants and respondent is settled under ‘The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and Form-4 has been issued. Further, learned counsel would submit that in view of the above development, appeal would no more survive for consideration. 2. Submission of the learned counsel is placed on record. 3. Appeal is disposed of as having become infructous. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE NC CT:bms: List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan