Ita/249/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Trichur v. M. Abdul Gadhafi
High Court
07 Feb 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/249/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Trichur v. M. Abdul Gadhafi
Date of order
07 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/249/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Trichur v. M. Abdul Gadhafi, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: We merely direct theAssessing Officer to decide on the question ofundisclosed income with respect to the property atMahe.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
THURSDAY ,THE 07TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 18TH MAGHA, 1940
ITA.No. 249 of 2012
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 143/2011 ofI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 25-05-2012
APPELLANT/S:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CALICUT
BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SENIOR COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)SRI.JOSE JOSEPH SC FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT/S:
M. ABDUL GADHAFI51, MC REVER SIDE ENCLAVE, THALASSERY P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT-695 532.
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT S. PARVATHI AMICUS CURIAE
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07.02.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Vinod Chandran, J.
The issue raised in the appeal is with respect
to the deletion by the Tribunal, of one additionmade by the Assessing Officer, in the case of therespondent-assessee herein relating to unexplainedinvestment in a property at Mahe. The assessmentwas made in the case of the assessee on thestrength of documents recovered on a searchconducted in the premises of one P.P.Bhaskaran.The assessment year herein is 2005-06.
2. The learned Counsel for the assesseepoints out that the issue in the case of JafeesMohammed & P.P.Baskaran for the assessment year2005-06 have been remanded back to the AssessingOfficer. In such circumstances, we do not thinkthere is any warrant for deciding on the questions
ITA No.249/2012
::3::
raised in this appeal. We merely direct theAssessing Officer to decide on the question ofundisclosed income with respect to the property atMahe. The I.T.A. is allowed. No order as tocosts.
Sd/-K.Vinod Chandran,Judge
jma
Sd/-Ashok Menon,Judge
ITA No.249/2012
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE-ATRUE COPY OF SEIZED ITEM NO.A-KKG 1(16).
ANNEXURE-BTRUE COPY OF SWORN STATEMENT OF SHRI P.P.BHASKARAN DATED 30/05/2007.P.P.BHASKARAN DATED 30/05/2007.
ANNEXURE-CTRUE COPY OF SWORN STATEMENT OF SHRI P.P. BHASKARAN DATED 30/08/2007.P.P. BHASKARAN DATED 30/08/2007.
ANNEXURE-DTRUE COPY OF STATEMENT RECORDED FROM SHRI K.ASHRAF.SHRI K.ASHRAF.
ANNEXURE-ETRUE COPY OF STATEMENT RECORDED FROM SHRI V.V.MOHAMMED.SHRI V.V.MOHAMMED.
ANNEXURE-FTRUE COPY ASSTT. ORDER FOR THE AY 2005-06.06.
ANNEXURE-GTRUE COPY OF ORDER OF CIT(A) 2005-06.ANNEXURE-HTRUE COPY OF ORDER OF ITAT DATED 30/11/2011.ANNEXURE-HTRUE COPY OF ORDER OF ITAT DATED 30/11/2011.
ANNEXURE-ITRUE COPY OF ORDER OF ITAT DATED 25/05/2012.25/05/2012.
ANNEXURE-JTRUE COPY OF ORDER OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF SHRI P.P. BHASKARAN.OF SHRI P.P. BHASKARAN.
ANNEXURE-KTRUE COPY OF ORDER OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF SHRI K. ASHRAF.OF SHRI K. ASHRAF.
ANNEXURE-LORDER OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN THE CASEOF M/S. KAMADHENU MILK PRODUCTS.OF M/S. KAMADHENU MILK PRODUCTS.
ANNEXURE-MCOPY OF INSTRUCTION NO.3/2011.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.