Case LawHigh Court › Ita/249/2019 Of The Principal Commission...

Ita/249/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sunny Jacob

High Court 29 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/249/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sunny Jacob
Date of order
29 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/249/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sunny Jacob, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 7TH KARTHIKA, 1941 ITA.No.249 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 321/2016 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXKOTTAYAM BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.RAVINDRANATHA MENON (SR.)SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE: SUNNY JACOB KALATHIL HOUSE, MOUNT WARDHA, KANJIKUZHY,KOTTAYAM THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON29.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J. & ANU SIVARAMAN, J. ----------------------------------------------------- I.T.A. No. 249 OF 2019 ------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29[th] day of October, 2019 Abdul Rehim, J. J U D G M E N T Learned Standing Counsel for Government of India(Taxes) appearing for the appellant sought permission to withdraw the above appeal on the basis of the litigation policy framed by theGovernment of India with respect to the tax matters. 2.Permission is granted. The above Income TaxAppeal is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. Registry shall make refund of court fee to the extent permissible under the relevant statutory provisions. Sd/- C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. ul/- Sd/- ANU SIVARAMAN, JUDGE. // True copy // P.S. to Judge. IT.A. No.249/2019 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE-AASSESSMENT ORDER U/S.153 A R.W.S 143(3)DATED 31.12.2009DATED 31.12.2009 ANNEXURE BCIT (A)'S ORDER NO.ITA /21,23,24 34/ CENT/KTM/CIT(A)/2009-10 DATED 22.09.2010CENT/KTM/CIT(A)/2009-10 DATED 22.09.2010 ANNEXURE-CITAT'S ORDER IN ITA NO.41,42 7 43/COCH/2011 DATED 16.11.201243/COCH/2011 DATED 16.11.2012 ANNEXURE-DHC'S ORDER IN ITA NO.90 OF 2013 AND CO.CASES DATED 092.01.2014CO.CASES DATED 092.01.2014 ANNEXURE-ESC'S ORDER IN SLP NO.14765-14767 OF 2014 DATED 15.09.20152014 DATED 15.09.2015 ANNEXURE-FIIND ASSESSMENT ORDER U/S.153 A R.W.S. 143 (3) R.W.S/.254 DATED 27.03.2014143 (3) R.W.S/.254 DATED 27.03.2014 ANNEXURE-GIIND CIT (A)'S ORDER NO.ITA 347-349/CIT(A) IV/COCHI/2015-16 ORDER 31.3.2016(A) IV/COCHI/2015-16 ORDER 31.3.2016 ANNEXURE-HIIND ITAT'S ORDER ITA NO.321/COCH/2016 DATED 10.10.2018DATED 10.10.2018 ANNEXURE-ICOPY OF SEIZED DOCUMENT ANNEXURE-JCOPY OF SEIZED DOCUMENT ANNEXURE-KCOPY OF THE TYPEWRITTEN TRANSLATION OF SEIZED DOCUMENTSSEIZED DOCUMENTS ANNEXURE-LCOPY OF THE TYPEWRITTEN TRANSLATION OF SEIZED DOCUMENTSSEIZED DOCUMENTS
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan