Case LawHigh Court › Ita/251/2009 Commissioner Of Income Tax,...

Ita/251/2009 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata – I v. Salarpuria Properties (P) Limited

High Court 28 Nov 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Ita/251/2009 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata – I v. Salarpuria Properties (P) Limited
Date of order
28 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/251/2009 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata – I v. Salarpuria Properties (P) Limited, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For the reasons afore-stated, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)ORIGINAL SIDE ITA/251/2009COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA – IVERSUSSALARPURIA PROPERTIES (P) LIMITED OD – 4 BEFORE: The Hon'ble Justice SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI The Hon'ble Justice RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ Date : 28[th ]November 2023. Appearance:Mr. Om Narayan Rai, AdvocateMr. Prithu Dudheria, Advocate… for appellant.Ms. Swapna Das, AdvocateMr. P. Jhunjhunwala, Advocate… for respondent. Both the learned counsel for the parties jointly state that the interestpayable to the assessee was Rs.1,46,402/-. Interest on interest was directed tobe paid on delayed payment. Interest on interest has been paid to the assesseepursuant to an order passed by the assessing officer under Section 143(3) ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961. In view of the statements made by the learned counsel for the parties onfacts, we find that the disputed amount / tax effect is less than the limitspecified by Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board DirectTaxes. Therefore, this appeal having been filed by the Revenue despite taxeffect being below the monetary limit fixed for filing appeal; deserves to bedismissed. For the reasons afore-stated, the appeal is dismissed. (SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.) s. kumar (RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan