Ita/25/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-Iv v. Synthetics And Chemicals Ltd
High Court
25 Oct 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ita/25/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-Iv v. Synthetics And Chemicals Ltd
Date of order
25 Oct 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/25/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-Iv v. Synthetics And Chemicals Ltd, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.25 OF 2001
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.25 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Applicant.
V/s.
M/s.Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Ashok Kontangel for applicant.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 25TH OCTOBER, 2005.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 25TH OCTOBER, 2005.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
. Heard. No substantial question of law is
involved since the assessment order was that of loss.
In that view of the matter, the application is
dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue