Ita/25/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri A S Chinnaswamy Raju
High Court
14 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/25/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri A S Chinnaswamy Raju
Date of order
14 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/25/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri A S Chinnaswamy Raju, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2).In view of the submission made, the appeal Is dismissed as sSuCN.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUON THE 14 DAY OF JANUARY, 2019
BEFORE.
THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH|
AND
THE HON'’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAW A
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.25 OF 2008
BETWEEN:
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
C.R. BUILDING,
QUEENS ROAD,
BENGALURU,
2).DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1),CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1),
BENGALURU._.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND"
1.SRI. A.S. CHINNASWAMY RAJU,
NO.104, R.V. LAYOUT,|
K.P. WEST EXTENSION, BENGALURU,BENGALURU,
... RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS. FILED UNDERSECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961,PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOMETAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALRU BENCH, IN
WEALTHTAXAPPEALNO.3/BANG/2007.DATED31.08.7007 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THEDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX CENTRALCIRCLE-2(1), BENGALURU.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR!ORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH, J., DELIVEREDTHE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submitthat the appeal is not maintainable in view of themonetary limits and also in terms of Circular No.3 of2018 dated 11.07.2018 passed by Director (ITJ),.
Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delni.
2).In view of the submission made, the appeal
Is dismissed as sSuCN.
Sd/-JUDGE|
Sd/-|JUDGE
SNC|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue