Case LawHigh Court › Ita/25/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/25/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Tvm v. M/S.kerala State Electricity Board,Tvm

High Court 27 Feb 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/25/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Tvm v. M/S.kerala State Electricity Board,Tvm
Date of order
27 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/25/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Tvm v. M/S.kerala State Electricity Board,Tvm, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Wedo not think the transaction between a Government organisation andthe Government is hit by Section 43B of the Income Tax Act becausein the connected cases we found Government allowed adjustment bythe KSEB against amounts otherwise due from Government to KSEB.We, therefore, dismiss the appeal filed...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 27TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 8TH PHALGUNA 1930 ITA.No. 25 of 2008() -------------------- ITA.N.O.824/COCH/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT:- ----------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THIRUVANANTHPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL,GOI(TAXES) SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT RESPONDENT(S): --------------- KERALA STATE ELCTRICITY BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. .................................................................... I.T. Appeal No.25 of 2008 .................................................................... Dated this the 27th day of February, 2009. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. The question raised in the appeal filed by the Revenue is aboutdisallowance under Section 43B, of the electricity duty collected byKSEB that was payable to the Government but in fact, not paid. Wedo not think the transaction between a Government organisation andthe Government is hit by Section 43B of the Income Tax Act becausein the connected cases we found Government allowed adjustment bythe KSEB against amounts otherwise due from Government to KSEB.We, therefore, dismiss the appeal filed by the Revenue. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge K.SURENDRA MOHANJudge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan