Case LawHigh Court › Ita/25/2010 Bansal Brothers (P) Ltd v. C...

Ita/25/2010 Bansal Brothers (P) Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata - Ii

High Court 27 Jul 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Ita/25/2010 Bansal Brothers (P) Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata - Ii
Date of order
27 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/25/2010 Bansal Brothers (P) Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata - Ii, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Therefore, it is submitted that the appellant seeks to withdraw this appeal.Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.The substantial questions of law suggested are left open.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

O - 89 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)ORIGINAL SIDE ITA/25/2010BANSAL BROTHERS (P) LTD.VS.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA - II BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAMAndTHE HON’BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAKDate : 27[th] July, 2022 Appearance :….for appellantMr. Prithu Dhudheria, Adv…For respondent. Mr. Swapna Das, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Das, Adv., The Court : This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passedby the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata. The learned Advocate for the appellantsubmitted that the appellant has availed benefit of Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and form Vhas been issued on 28[th] February 2022. Therefore, it is submitted that the appellant seeks to withdraw this appeal.Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.The substantial questions of law suggested are left open. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (BIVAS PATTANAYAK, J.) Pkd/GH
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan