Case LawHigh Court › Ita/25/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/25/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.iqura Technologies Pvt Ltd

High Court 17 Dec 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/25/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.iqura Technologies Pvt Ltd
Date of order
17 Dec 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/25/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.iqura Technologies Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU DATBD THIS THR 17 DAY OF DECEMBER, 20109 PRESENT THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK VINEBT SARAN| AND THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICK S.SUJATHA ITA No. 25/2010C/WITA No.27/2010, ITA No. 23/2010, ITA No. 24/2010ITA No. 26/2010 IN ITA Nos.25/2010 & 23/2010 BETWEEN: 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,| CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE. 2. LHE INCOME TAX OFFICER, ~ WARD-11(2), BANGALORE. ...APPELLANTS | (COMMON) (BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND & MS.PREETHI.J.D-ADVs) AND: M/S IQURA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.,NO.95/1, 87, HOSUR MAIN ROAD,MADIWALA,|(BY SRI.CHYTHANYA.K.K-ADV) BANGALORE — 560 O68. ... RESPONDENT| (COMMON) | IN ITAs Nos.27/2010, 24/2010 & 26/2010 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMB TAX. C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, © BANGALORE. 2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-11(2), BANGALORE._ APPBRLLANTS)(COMMON) | (BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND & Ms. PREETHI.J.D-ADV) | AND: M/S IQURA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.,NO.95/1, 87, HOSUR MAIN ROAD,MADIWALA, BANGALORE-560 068. —. RESPONDENT(COMMON) (BY SRI.CHYTHANYA.K.K-ADV) THESE JITAs ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OFINCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDERPASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA Nos.282/BNG/2009, 2384/BNG/2009,280/BNG/2009,281/BNG/2009—ANT)2383 /BANG/2009 RESPECTIVELY DATED: 21.8.2009, ETC. THESE ITAs COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY,VINEET SARAN J..DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants-Revenue hasplaced before us a recent Circular No.21/2015 dated|10.12.2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct taxes,wherein the monetary limit of the tax effect for filing appealsbefore the High Court has been enhanced from Rs.10 lacs to |Rs.20 lacs. In paragraph-10 of the said Circular, it has beenclarified that the same will apply retrospectively to pending| appeals also, which, if below the specified tax limits, may bewithdrawn/not pressed. 2.Learned counsel for the appellants has stated.that the tax effect in the present appeals is below thespecified limit of Rs.20 lacs. 3.Accordingly, in view of the Circular No.21/2010dated 10.12.2015, the tax effect in these appeals being less|than Rs.20 lacs, the appeals standdismissed. sd/-JUDGE|Sd/-.JUDGE| TL|
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan