Case LawHigh Court › Ita/254/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/254/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. R. Tulsidas Exports Pvt Ltd

High Court 12 Mar 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ita/254/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. R. Tulsidas Exports Pvt Ltd
Date of order
12 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
1984-85
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/254/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. R. Tulsidas Exports Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.254 OF 2002 The Commissioner of Income Tax - I .. Petitioner. V/s. R. Tulsidar Exports Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent. Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the petitioner. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 12TH MARCH, 2007. P.C. : 1. The above application pertains to AY 1984-85 seeking to raise following question of law : Whether the I.T.A.T. was right in the circumstances of the case and in law directing the Assessing Officer to allow assessee’s claim of 80 HHC of the I.T. Act on export of rice ? 2. The learned counsel Mr.Kotangale appearing for the applicant fairly states that the issue is covered against the revenue and in favour of the assessee wherein two SLP’s filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT V/s. Deva Singh Sham Singh 209 ITR (St.) 88-89 (SC) and in the case of CIT V/s. Sachdeva & Sons (1995) 211 ITR (St.) 8 (SC) wherein similar questions raised by the revenue have been rejected. 3. In view thereof, the present application stands dismissed. (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) 2 (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan