Case LawHigh Court › Ita/255/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/255/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. N.k.mustaffa

High Court 27 Aug 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/255/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. N.k.mustaffa
Date of order
27 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/255/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. N.k.mustaffa, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Question raised is whether the Tribunal was justified in confirming deletion of the unexplained cash credit.

Decision: We do not find any substantial question of law arising fromthe order of the Tribunal because cash credits are found by the Tribunalto be entries towards source of fund from undisclosed business.Consequently the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM THURSDAY, THE 27TH AUGUST 2009 / 5TH BHADRA 1931 ITA.No. 255 of 2009() --------------------- ITA.75/2001 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT ---------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT ------------------------ N.K.MUSTAFA, NATIONAL GLASS MART, MAIN ROAD, QUILANDY. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. .................................................................... I.T. Appeal No.255 of 2009 ....................................................................Dated this the 27th day of August, 2009. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Question raised is whether the Tribunal was justified in confirming deletion of the unexplained cash credit. However, we findthat both the lower authorities allowed the claim because they felt thatafter making addition towards income from unaccounted business,there is no scope for addition of cash credits which were found to bebogus. We do not find any substantial question of law arising fromthe order of the Tribunal because cash credits are found by the Tribunalto be entries towards source of fund from undisclosed business.Consequently the appeal is dismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge C.K.ABDUL REHIM Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan