Case LawHigh Court › Ita/258/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/258/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Venkatesha Education Society

High Court 10 Jan 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/258/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Venkatesha Education Society
Date of order
10 Jan 2023
Assessment year(s)
2009-2010
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/258/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Venkatesha Education Society, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: This appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitally signedby YASHODHANLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10 DAY OF JANUARY, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 258 OF 2013 BETWEEN: 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE 2.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2) CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2) C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE …APPELLANTS (BY SHRI. K.V. ARAVIND, SENIOR STANDING COUSNEL) AND: M/S VENKATESHA EDUCATION SOCIETYNO.125, ARMSTRONG ROAD SHIVAJI NAGR BANGALORE-560 001 …RESPONDENT (BY SHRI. S PARTHASARATHI, ADVOCATE) THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF I.T. ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 21.12.2012 PASSED IN ITA NO.106/BANG/2012, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ALLOW THE APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.106/BANG/2012 DATED 21.12.2012 CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -1(2), BANGALORE AND ETC. THIS ITA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Ms.Tanmayee Rajkumar, learned advocate for the respondent has filed memo dated 02.01.2023 stating that matter has been settled under Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and nothing survives in this appeal. 2. Shri K.V.Aravind, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue does not dispute the facts stated in the memo and prays that this appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Leave granted. This appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE YN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan