Ita/261/2010 Of Commisioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mahat Systems Pvt Ltd
High Court
13 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/261/2010 Of Commisioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mahat Systems Pvt Ltd
Date of order
13 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/261/2010 Of Commisioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mahat Systems Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the submission made, the appeal is|dismissed as sucn. | SD/- JUDGE SD/-_ JUDGE| Cm/-_
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|
ON THE 13 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018|
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND|
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. Z261L OF ZO
BETWEEN
1.|Commissioner of |
Income Tax
Mangalore.
2 |Income Tax Officer
Ward 12(1)
Bangalore.. Appellants
(By Sri. E.I. Sanmathi, Advocate )
AND
M/s Mahat Systems Pvt. Ltd.,
No,6/7, Infantry Road
Bangalore-560001. Respondent.
(By Smt. Jinita Chatterjee, Advocate for
Sri. S. Partnasarathi, Advocate)|
This income tax appeal is filed under Section 260-A of I.T. Act, 1961 arising out of order dated: 12.03.2010 passed|in ITA No.615/Bang/2009, for the Assessment year 2005-06,praying to i) formulate the substantial questions of law statedtnerein ii) allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the|ITAL,BangaloreinTTA)No.615/Bang/2009dated17.03.2010 and etc.
Tnis income tax appeal, coming on for hearing this day,RAVI MALIMATH.,J delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Tne learned counsel! for the appellants submits that the
appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary limits andalso in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.0/.2018|passed by Director (ITJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New|DelNl.
2. In view of the submission made, the appeal is|dismissed as sucn. |
SD/-
JUDGE
SD/-_
JUDGE|
Cm/-_
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue