Ita/261/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Ludhiana v. M/S Avon Ispat & Powers Ltd Ludhiana
High Court
09 Sep 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/261/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Ludhiana v. M/S Avon Ispat & Powers Ltd Ludhiana
Date of order
09 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/261/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Ludhiana v. M/S Avon Ispat & Powers Ltd Ludhiana, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No.261 of 2016 (O&M)Date of Decision :09.09.2019
Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax-2, Ludhiana
2 '#-#
..--- Appellant
M/s Avon Ispat & Power Ltd.
eee RESpondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI, CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ARUN PALLI, JUDGE
Present ;Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate and
Mr. Chetan Sood, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for the respondent.
KRISHNA MURARI, CHIEF JUSTICE(Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since thetax effect involved is less than|450 lacs, he has instructions to withdraw thepresent appeal in view of Circular No. 03/2018, dated 11.07.2018 issued bythe Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi. However, he has prayed thatliberty be granted to the revenue to file an application for revival of theappeal in case something survives therein,
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is,however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not betaken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legalissue as Claimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in anappropriate case.
(KRISHNA MURARITCHIEF JUSTICE
(ARUN PALLI)JUDGE
09.09 2019Manoj Bhutani
Whether speaking/reasonedYes/NoWhether reportableYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.