Case LawHigh Court › Ita/26/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/26/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City-Vi v. Borocil Glass Works Ltd

High Court 12 Mar 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ita/26/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City-Vi v. Borocil Glass Works Ltd
Date of order
12 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/26/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City-Vi v. Borocil Glass Works Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.24 OF 2006 AND INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.25 OF 2006 AND INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.26 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income tax-VI .. Petitioner. V/s. Borosil Glass Works Limited .. Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the petitioner (in all 3 matters) CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 12TH MARCH, 2007. P.C. : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In all the above three matters, the applications are being filed with regard to the order passed in a miscellaneous application. Such an application is not maintainable in view of the decision in the case of Director of Income-tax (Exemption) V/s. Guru Nanak Vidya Bhandar Trust 272 ITR 379 (Bom). 3. In view thereof, all the above applications stand dismissed. (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) 2 (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan