Ita/26/2019 Of M/S Hotel Landmark, The Mall , Shimla v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Railaway Board Building, The Mall, Shimla
High Court
30 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Ita/26/2019 Of M/S Hotel Landmark, The Mall , Shimla v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Railaway Board Building, The Mall, Shimla
Date of order
30 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/26/2019 Of M/S Hotel Landmark, The Mall , Shimla v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Railaway Board Building, The Mall, Shimla, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLAON THE 30[th] DAY OF MARCH 2022
BEFORE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SABINA&
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2018 & 26 OF 2019
1. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2018
Between:-SH. RAGHUNATH SINGH THAKUR, S/O SH. RAM DASS THAKUR, MARINA HOTEL, THE MALL, SHIMLA, HIMACHAL PRADESH.
….APPELLANT
(SH. VISHAL MOHAN, ADVOCATE)ANDPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAILWAY BOARD BUILDING, THE MALL SHIMLA.
....RESPONDENT
(SH. VINAY KUTHIALA, SR. ADVICATE WITH MR. DIWAN SINGH NEGI, ADVOCATE).
2. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2019
M/S HOTEL LANDMARK, THE MALL SHIMLA, THROUGH ITS PARTNER SH. VINOD KUMAR AGGARWAL.
…APPELLANT
(SH. VISHAL MOHAN, ADVOCATE)
AND
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAILWAY BOARD BUILDING, THE MALL SHIMLA.
….RESPONDENT.
(SH. VINAY KUTHIALA, SR. ADVOCATE WITH MR. DIWAN SINGH NEGI, ADVOCATE).
This appeal coming on for hearing this day, Hon’ble
Ms. Justice Sabina, delivered the following:
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that he may be permitted to withdrawal the appeals, as the parties have amicably settled the dispute under the provisions of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (2 of 2020).
2. Ordered accordingly.
(Sabina)
Judge
30[th] March, 2022
(kck)
(Satyen Vaidya)Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.