Ita/265/2013 Of M/S.escapade Resorts Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
30 Oct 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/265/2013 Of M/S.escapade Resorts Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
30 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/265/2013 Of M/S.escapade Resorts Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2014/8TH KARTHIKA, 1936
ITA.No. 265 of 2013 ()
-----------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 718/COCH/2007 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHINBENCH DATED 16-11-2012
APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT/ASSESSEE:
----------------------------------------------------------------
M/S.ESCAPADE RESORTS PVT. LTD. C/O.CASINO HOTEL W/ISLAND, COCHIN -3.
BY ADVS.SRI.JOSEPH MARKOSE (SR.) SRI.V.ABRAHAM MARKOS SRI.BINU MATHEW SRI.TOM THOMAS (KAKKUZHIYIL) SRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS SRI.ABRAHAM VARGHESE THARAKAN
RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT/DEPARTMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1) ERNAKULAM-682018.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-10-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ITA NO.265/13
APPENDIX
APPELLANT'S EXHIBITS
ANNEXURE A:TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DT27.09.2006
ANNEXURE B:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED IN THEAPPEAL DT 20.04.2007 OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS) II.
ANNEXURE C:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT 16/11/2012PASSED BY THE ITAT IN ITA NO.718/COCH/2007.
//True Copy//
Rp
PA to Judge
ANTONY DOMINIC & ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JJ.=============================== Income Tax Appeal No. 265 of 2013=========================
Dated this the 30[th] day of October, 2014
J U D G M E N T
Antony Dominic, J.
Considering the nature of the orders passed by the assessingofficer, which is now restored by the Tribunal in the impugned order,we do not see any scope for raising the questions that are framed bythe appellant for the consideration of this Court.
Appeal is, therefore, closed.
Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE
Rp
Sd/- ANIL K. NARENDRAN JUDGE
//True Copy//
PA to Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.