Case LawHigh Court › Ita/267/2002 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Ita/267/2002 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kerala State Development Corpn

High Court 21 May 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/267/2002 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kerala State Development Corpn
Date of order
21 May 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/267/2002 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kerala State Development Corpn, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: We, therefore, dismiss the appeal on this issue also.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST MAY 2008 / 31ST VAISAKHA 1930 ITA.No. 267 of 2002() --------------------- ITA.241/COCH/1998 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT ------------------------------------ THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON(SR.),SR.COUNSEL FOR IT SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT ----------------------- KERALA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.PATHROSE MATTHAI (SR.) SRI.SAJI VARGHESE THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. .................................................................... I.T. Appeal No.267 of 2002....................................................................Dated this the 21st day of May, 2008. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Heard Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant and Sri.PathroseMathai, Senior counsel appearing for the respondent. The assessee is aGovernment of Kerala undertaking constituted essentially to promoteindustrialisation of the State. The various issues raised except questionNo.7 are covered by Division Bench judgment of this court in assessee'sown case in I.T.A. No.212/2001 dated 4.2.2008. Therefore, following thesaid judgment we dismiss the appeal on all questions raised except onquestion No.7. So far as question No.7 is concerned, the issue raised iswhether in the computation of income tax, the assessee is entitled todeduction of interest on interest tax paid. Interest tax is an admissiblededuction in the computation of taxable income. We do not think thedepartment's contention that interest on interest tax is penalty or fine.Interest is essentially compensatory in nature and partakes the character of tax itself and consequently is an allowable deduction. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal on this issue also. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge pms V.K.MOHANANJudge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan