Case LawHigh Court › Ita/270/2012 Of Sri S N Vijeth v. The In...

Ita/270/2012 Of Sri S N Vijeth v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 16 Feb 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/270/2012 Of Sri S N Vijeth v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
16 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
2005-2006
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/270/2012 Of Sri S N Vijeth v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the assessee to revive the same if occasion so arises.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY BETWEEN: I.T.A. NO.270 OF 2012 SRI. S.N. VIJETH CONTRACTOR , CANAL STREET, NEW SBM ROAD, SALIGRAMA, K.R. NAGARA-TALUKA, MYSORE-DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. V.CHANDRASEKHAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE) AND: THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3), NO. 55/1, "SHILPA SREE", OPP. STERLING THEATRE, VISHWESHWARNAGAR, MYSORE. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 30.03.2012 PASSED IN ITA NO.773/BANG/2011, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-2006 PRAYING TO; (a) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT; (b) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL IN ITA NO.773/BANG/2011 DATED 30.03.2012; (c) PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS, AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Mr.V.Chandrasekhar, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. 2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the assessee to revive the same if occasion so arises. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE GH
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan