Case Law › High Court › Ita/270/2015 Of Dr.r.p.patel v. The Comm...

Ita/270/2015 Of Dr.r.p.patel v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 13 Jan 2023 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

13 Jan 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/270/2015 Of Dr.r.p.patel v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Income tax appeal and the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI FRIDAY, THE 13 DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 23RD POUSHA, 1944 I.T.A. NO.270OF 2015 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH) APPELLANT: DR.R.P.PATEL, HAHNEMANN HOUSE, COLLEGE ROAD, KOTTAYAM (PRESENTLY RESIDING AT HAHNEMANN HOUSE-MEISSEN, ATMA JYOTI ASHRAM ROAD, SUBHANPURA.P.O., VADODARA, GUJARAT) BY ADV SRI.RAMESH CHERIAN JOHN HAHNEMANN HOUSE, COLLEGE ROAD, RESPONDENT: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SASTHRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM-686 001. BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.R.MENON, SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING, THIS I.T.A. HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.01.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).35338/2005, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI FRIDAY, THE 13 DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 23RD POUSHA, 1944 W.P.(C) NO.35338OF 2005 PETITIONER: DR. R.P.PATEL, HAHNEMANN HOUSE, COLLEGE ROAD, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV SRI.RAMESH CHERIAN JOHN RESPONDENT: ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-I, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.01.2023, ALONG WITH ITA.270/2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT (Dated: 13[th] January, 2023) S.V.Bhatti, J. Heard Adv.Ramesh Cherian John. Having regard to the instructions received from the assessee, the appellant does not press the appeal and seeks the liberty of the court to withdraw the appeal and writ petitions. Income tax appeal and the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- S.V.BHATTI, JUDGE Sd/- BASANT BALAJI, JUDGE ss

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.